Cases 101 - 107 of 107
Lastra v. Columbia University et al
as 1:2007cv07479
Plaintiff:
James Lastra
Defendant:
Columbia University, Joseph Ulam, David Grad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lopez et al v. Flor de Mayo, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv06526
Plaintiff:
Lopez, Adolfo Lopez, Venancio Galindo and others
Defendant:
Flor de Mayo, Inc., Phillip Chu, Dennis Chu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chao v. Hurtig-Evans International, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv03332
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Hurtig-Evans International, Inc., HEI, Inc., Phillip K.C. Casimir and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nowak et al v. City of New York et al
as 7:2007cv00612
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Abate, Jr., Marisa E. Abbriano, Frank Adino and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Fire Department of the City of New York, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ferry et al v. SGS Control Services Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv07111
Plaintiff:
Brian Ferry, Rene M. Rendon, Houston C. Ervin and others
Defendant:
SGS Control Services Inc., SGS North America Inc. and Joshua A. Kirchner
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Stephen M. Brown, Sr. and Richard Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Robinson, et al v. Eastman Kodak
as 6:2002cv06204
Plaintiff:
Lawrence T Heinsler, Stephen M. Ellis, Thomas L. Braden and others
Special Master:
Esq. Steven V Modica
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hallissey, et al v. America Online, Inc., et al
as 1:1999cv03785
Plaintiff:
Trinka MacMurrtaugh, Gail R. Mitchell, Donna Reynolds and others
Undetermined:
Mark K. Leiden, Sr. and Jamie Richardson
Petitioner:
Lisa Berendt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
