Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Jenney v. Fletcher-Thompson Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00667
Defendant:
Fletcher-Thompson Inc and Michael S. Marcinek
Plaintiff:
John D. Jenney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ye v. Po's Rice & Spice LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00604
Plaintiff:
Zhao Jun Ye
Defendant:
Po's Rice & Spice LLC, Poyee Fong, Bao Er Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ye v. Fong's Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00603
Plaintiff:
Zhao Jun Ye
Defendant:
John Fong, Stella Fong and Fong's Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bratton v. Bond Limousine, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
John W. Bratton
Defendant:
Bond Limousine, LLC and Earl W. Mellow, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cana et al v. Tiffany Nails, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00503
Plaintiff:
Ana Cana and Maritza Paca
Defendant:
Tiffany Nails, LLC, Jung Soon Paek, Song Hak Paek and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin et al v. Kobe Grill, Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Sheng Jian Lin , Sheng Hui Lin and Chao Di Chen
Defendant:
Kobe Grill, Corp., Li Zhong Chen, Heng Qian Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dineen et al v. Maine Fish Market Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01554
Plaintiff:
Kristen Dineen and John Tedone
Defendant:
Maine Fish Market Restaurant, Inc. and Nicholas Vamvilis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams et al v. New Haven
as 3:2015cv01311
Plaintiff:
Troy Adams , Sean Ahern , Patrick Andrews and others
Defendant:
City of New Haven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sandoval v. Element 116, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv01255
Plaintiff:
Edgar Sandoval
Defendant:
Element 116, LLC, John Ginnetti and Danielle Ginnetti
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stancil et al v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01013
Plaintiff:
Patrick Stancil and Amilcar Huyhua
Defendant:
P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
