Cases 11 - 16 of 16
In Re: JPMorgan Chase and Co.
as 14-1514
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scrydoff, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Loeza and Matt Ward
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and John Does 1-100
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bernadette J. Ulissi and others
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Yuen
as 13-2525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Estate of Robert von Tobien
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
George Yuen
In re JPMorgan Chase and Co. ERISA Litigation
as 1:2012cv04027
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scrydoff
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Company , The JPMorgan Retirement Plan , The JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Yuen et al
as 1:2011cv09192
Interpleader_plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Interpleader_defendant:
George Yuen and Estate of Robert von Tobien
Cross_claimant:
Estate of Robert von Tobien and George Yuen
Cross_defendant:
George Yuen and Estate of Robert von Tobien
Counter_claimant:
Estate of Robert von Tobien
Counter_defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Board Of Trustees Of The AFTRA Retirement Fund et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
Board Of Trustees Of The AFTRA Retirement Fund, Board Of Trustees Of The AFTRA Retirement Fund, Board Of Trustees Of The AFTRA Retirement Fund and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burns v. Marley Company Pension Plan for Hourly Employees at Stockton, California et al
as 1:2008cv03763
Plaintiff:
David R. Burns
Defendant:
Marley Company Pension Plan for Hourly Employees at Stockton, California, Administrative Committe of Marley Company Pension Plan for Hourly Employees at Stockton, California, SPX Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
