Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee v. Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv07606
Defendant: Aon Investments USA Inc., Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC and Aon Hewitt Investment Consulting, Inc.
Plaintiff: Blue Cross Blue Shield Association National Employee Benefits Committee
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
3Rd Party Defendant: Robert Kolodgy, Michael Mizeur, John Giblin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local No. 28 Benefit Funds and Plans et al v. Sharp Mechanical Service Inc.
as 1:2017cv05261
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local No. 28 Benefit Funds and Plans , Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 28 Vacation Fund , Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 28 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Sharp Mechanical Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Sallenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavarro, LLP et al
as 1:2016cv05821
Defendant: John R. Lopresti, RoseMarie Lopresti and Sallenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavarro, LLP
Plaintiff: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Neurological Surgery, P.C. et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 2:2015cv06917
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff: Neurological Surgery, P.C. and Artem Y. Vaynman, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Neurological Surgery, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv06917
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff: Neurological Surgery, P.C. and Artem Y. Vaynman, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
J. F. L. et al v. Werner et al
as 1:2015cv02027
Defendant: Amboy Medical Practice, P.C., Island Obstetrical & Gynecological Care, P.C., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and others
Plaintiff: J. F. L., John R. Lopresti and Rosemarie Lopresti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund, Additional Security Benefit Fund, Vacation & Holiday Fund, Trade Education Fund and 401 (K) Savings Plan et al v. Sharp Plumbing Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv01782
Defendant: Brook Plumbing & Heating Corp. and Sharp Plumbing Corp.
Plaintiff: Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund, Additional Security Benefit Fund, Vacation & Holiday Fund, Trade Education Fund and 401 (K) Savings Plan and Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pepsico Salaried Employees Retirement Plan et al v. Mandes et al
as 7:2008cv07022
Plaintiff: Pepsico Salaried Employees Retirement Plan, Maria Sharpe, Greg Heaslip and others
Defendant: Vincent M. Mandes and Ameriprise Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund, Additional Security Benefit Fund, Vacation & Holiday Fund, Trade Education Fund and 401(k) Savings Plan et al v. Sharp Plumbing Corp.
as 1:2007cv02823
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Welfare Fund, Additional Security Benefit Fund, Vacation & Holiday Fund, Trade Education Fund and 401(k) Savings Plan, George W. Reilly and Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Defendant: Sharp Plumbing Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Levin, et al v. Raynor, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv04697
Plaintiff: Emanuel Leventhal , Shelly Appleton , Irwin Solomon and others
Defendant: Bruce Raynor , Edgar Romney , Edward Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?