Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Genentech, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv09463
Plaintiff:
Genentech, Inc.
Defendant:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH v. Novo Nordisk Inc
as 1:2009cv05651
Plaintiff:
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH and others
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc. and Novo Nordisk Inc.
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanofi-Aventis et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 1:2008cv06286
Plaintiff:
Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Aventis and others
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Sun Pharma Global, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Sun Pharma Global, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership, Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership, Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sanofi-Synthelabo, et al v. Apotex Inc., et al
as 1:2002cv02255
Plaintiff:
Sanofi-Synthelabo , Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. , Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership and others
Defendant:
Apotex Inc. , Apotex Corp. , Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. and others
Counter_claimant:
Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp.
Counter_defendant:
Sanofi-Synthelabo, Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership
Amicu:
National Association of Chain Drug Stores
Movant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Andrew G. Bodnar
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
