Cases 1 - 10 of 15
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Seong Yeol Lee and Ameritrust Corporation
Nominal Defendant:
Beespoke Capital, Inc., Beespoke Capital, LLC, Alice Mee-Hyang Choi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Ryan v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv05111
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Thomas J. Sullivan, Joshua H. Levine and others
Stein v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04423
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Mortman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04951
Plaintiff:
Frederick Mortman
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Schallman v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04391
Plaintiff:
Nanci Schallman
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Waterman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03341
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03302
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Wang v. CorePoint Lodging Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging Inc., Keith A. Cline, Mitesh B. Shah and others
Main Line Capital Investments, LLC v. CorePoint Lodging Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Main Line Capital Investments, LLC
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging Inc., Keith A. Cline, James R. Abrahamson and others
Whitfield v. CorePoint Lodging Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging Inc., Mitesh B. Shah, James R. Abrahamson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
