Cases 1 - 10 of 265
David v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Michael R. David
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
David K. Barr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fricker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03658
Plaintiff:
David A. Fricker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Czekaj v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
David Czekaj
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jacobs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
David Jacobs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gunther v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
David A. Gunther
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schuse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Michael David Schuse
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chapman David v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06214
Plaintiff:
Amber J Chapman David
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schultz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Schultz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Davide v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Matthew Davide
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
