Cases 1 - 10 of 21
United States of America, ex r v. Amgen Inc.
as 22-18
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ex Rel. Joseph Piacentile and Kevin B. Kilcoyne, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Piacentile and Kevin Kilcoyne
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc., Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc. and others
Global Aerospace, Inc. et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv05373
Plaintiff:
Global Aerospace, Inc. , Global Aerospace Underwriting Managers Limited , United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs- v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 18-1264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Aktiengesellschaft In Muenchen, New Reinsurance Company, Ltd., AIG Specialty Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Al Rajhi Bank, National Commercial Bank and Saudi Binladin Group
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
Underwriting Members of Lloyd v. Al Rajhi Bank
as 18-1201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 2, Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 53, Underwriting of Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 55 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Al Rajhi Bank, National Commercial Bank and Saudi Binladin Group
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft In Muenchen et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2017cv07914
Plaintiff:
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft In Muenchen , New Reinsurance Company, Ltd. , AIG Specialty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina, Al Rajhi Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
United States of America ex re v. Allergan, Inc.
as 17-2191
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Montana, District of Columbia and others
Defendant:
DEF and Allergan PLC
Defendant - Appellant:
Allergan Inc.
United States of America v. Amgen, Inc.
as 17-1522
Plaintiff:
United States of America, and the States of Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D., State of California, Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D., State of Colorado, Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D. and others
Appellant:
Daniel Coyne, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
Amgen, Inc.
United States of America v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 15-2449
Plaintiff:
State of New York, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss, State of Delaware, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss, District of Columbia, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul Bishop, Robert Krauss and United States of America, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss
Defendant - Appellee:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and The Clearing House Association, L.L.C.
Movant:
Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund
In the Matter of the Application of Hamshire Recreation, LLC and Hampshire Club, Inc v. The Village of Mamaroneck et al
as 7:2014cv07228
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Application of Hamshire Recreation, LLC and Hampshire Club, Inc.
Defendant:
The Village of Mamaroneck , The Village of Mamaroneck Board of Trustees and The Village of Mamaroneck Zoning Board of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The New Hampshire Insurance Company et al v. AXA Verischerung AG et al
as 1:2014cv05237
Petitioner:
The New Hampshire Insurance Company , American Home Assurance Company , National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and others
Respondent:
AXA Verischerung AG and Colisee Re
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
