Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Lansuppe Feeder, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, National
as 16-4061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Lansuppe Feeder, LLC
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for Soloso CDO 2005-1 Ltd. and Soloso CDO 2005-1 Ltd.
Intervenor - Appellant:
Oxford University Bank, Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Marks, Coastal Commerce Bank and others
Intervenor:
Holmes County Bank and Trust Company
Lansuppe Feeder, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2015cv07034
Plaintiff:
Lansuppe Feeder, LLC
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Soloso CDO 2005-1 Ltd.
Intervenor:
Oxford University Bank , Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Marks , Coastal Commerce Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Global Reinsurance Corporation v. Century Indemnity Company
as 15-2164
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Global Reinsurance Corporation of America, successor in interest to Constitution Reinsurance Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Century Indemnity Company, successor in interest to CCI Insurance Company, successor in interest to Insurance Company of North America
Amicus Curiae:
Aon Benfield U.S., Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC, Jlt RE (north America) Inc. and others
Pesantez v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 1:2014cv04882
Plaintiff:
Jaime Pesantez
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP, attorney-in-fact for DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc., successor in interest to The Bank of New York Mellon Trustee for CSMC Trust 2011-3 and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mineweaser v. One Beacon America Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00585
Defendant:
One Beacon America Insurance Company, Resolute Management, Inc., Administrator for One Beacon America Insurance Company, Seaton Insurance Company, Individually and as Successor to Unigard Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Edna K. Mineweaser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aktas v. JMC Development Co., Inc.
as 13-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Necdet Aktas and Lisa Aktas
Third-Party-Defendant:
Michael Terry, North East Underlayments, LLC and Northwoods Concrete, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph M. Cantanucci, Jr., Granville Glass and Granite, Inc., Granville Glass and Granite of Hudson Falls, Inc., as Successor in interest to Granville Glass and Granite, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JMC Development Co., Inc. and Stephen M. Jung, DBA Jung Architecture
Aktas v. JMC Development Co., Inc.
as 13-534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Necdet Aktas and Lisa Aktas
Third-Party-Defendant:
Michael Terry, North East Underlayments, LLC and Northwoods Concrete, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph M. Cantanucci, Jr., Granville Glass and Granite, Inc., Granville Glass and Granite of Hudson Falls, Inc., as Successor in interest to Granville Glass and Granite, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JMC Development Co., Inc. and Stephen M. Jung, DBA Jung Architecture
McCall v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation
as 11-4164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Linda McCall, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Exploration LLC, Chesapeake Louisiana LP and others
Grynberg v. BP, P.L.C.
as 11-1727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jack J. Grynberg, Grynberg Production Corporation (Texas), Inc., Grynberg Production Corporation (Colorado), Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BP, P.L.C., a foreign corporation, individually successor in interest ARCO International Oil and Gas Company, DBA BP Corporation North America, Inc.
Frampton v. Kitagawa Motors, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01244
Plaintiff:
William Frampton
Defendant:
Kitagawa Motors, Inc. , Chrysler Motors LLC. , Chrysler Group LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Kitagawa Motors, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Chrysler Motors LLC. and Does 1-50
Miscellaneou:
Old Carco Liquidation Trust, Successor in Interest to Defendant Chrysler Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
