Cases 71 - 80 of 131
Riley et al v. Hannibal et al
as 1:2015cv01399
Plaintiff:
Blackstreet Entertainment, Inc. (Blackstreet) and Edward T. Riley, Sr.
Defendant:
Doe Corporation 1-10, Chauncey Hannibal and John and Jane Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Two's Company, Inc. v. Two's Company Events & Specialty Boutique, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv01019
Plaintiff:
Two's Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Two's Company Events & Specialty Boutique, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Famous Joe's Pizza, Inc. v. Little Joe Pizza, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09742
Plaintiff:
Famous Joe's Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
Little Joe Pizza, Inc., Natalia Ramirez , Sergio Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
David Webb LLC v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2014cv06976
Plaintiff:
David Webb LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Cardenas and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Flaherty v. Irishcentral L.L.C. et al
as 1:2014cv06837
Plaintiff:
Dennis Flaherty
Defendant:
Irishcentral L.L.C. and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Katzs Delicatessen of Houston Street Inc. v. TMA Trading Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01690
Plaintiff:
Katzs Delicatessen of Houston Street Inc.
Defendant:
TMA Trading Inc., TAREK, Mohamed Salem and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Eyeo GMBH v. Does 1-5
as 1:2014cv01280
Plaintiff:
Eyeo GMBH
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Penetron International Ltd. v. W.R. Meadows, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00870
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and W.R. Meadows, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Penetron International Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng
as 14-344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-5
Defendant - Appellant:
Supap Kirtsaeng, DBA Bluechristine99
Ploom, Inc. v. JHONY USA Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08988
Plaintiff:
Ploom, Inc.
Defendant:
JHONY USA Inc., ABC Corporations 1-5 and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
