Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Small Business Bodyguard Inc. v. House pf Moxie, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07170
Plaintiff:
Small Business Bodyguard Inc.
Defendant:
House pf Moxie, Inc.
Consolidated_counter_defendant:
Rachel Rodgers and Rachel Rodgers Law Office
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
House pf Moxie, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Rachel Rodgers and Rachel Rodgers Law Office
Counter_claimant:
House pf Moxie, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Small Business Bodyguard Inc. , Rachel Rodgers and Rachel Rodgers Law Office
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
The Football Association Premi v. Youtube, Inc.
as 10-3342
Plaintiff:
Robert Tur, DBA Los Angeles News Service and The Scottish Premier League Limited
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Football Association Premier League Limited, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bourne Co., Cal IV Entertainment, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Youtube, Inc., Youtube, LLC and Google, Inc.
Impulsive Music et al v. Pomodoro Grill, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv06293
Plaintiff:
Impulsive Music, Dorothy F. Rodgers, Lawrence B. Buttenwieser and others
Defendant:
Pomodoro Grill, Inc. and Sami Mina
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zepka et al v. Nexxar Group, Inc.
as 1:2007cv07405
Plaintiff:
Rodger Zepka, Eleno Ramos, Envios Rd Corporation and others
Defendant:
Nexxar Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03582
Plaintiff:
The Football Association Premier League Limited, The Football Association Premier League Limited, The Football Association Premier League Limited and others
Defendant:
Youtube, Inc., Youtube, Inc., Youtube, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rodgers v. Anderson et al
as 1:2004cv01149
Plaintiff:
Nile Rodgers
Defendant:
Alfa Anderson, Norma Jean Wright and Luci Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
