Cases 31 - 40 of 1,162
Dicarlo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv02117
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dicarlo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pattington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Pattington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seed v. Saul
as 1:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Milbern Seed
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Sherwood v. Saul
as 7:2021cv10847
Plaintiff:
Brian Sherwood Jr and Brian Sherwood
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis v. Kijakazi
as 6:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Justin C Lewis
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bermudez v. Saul
as 1:2021cv09983
Plaintiff:
Santos Bermudez
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grencer v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01046
Plaintiff:
Andrew Grencer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06565
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith and Andrew C. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rothstein v. Kijakazi
as 6:2021cv00881
Plaintiff:
Kevin Andrew Rothstein
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Apuzzo v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2021cv06491
Plaintiff:
Glenn Apuzzo
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.