Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lake v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06337
Plaintiff:
Chris Lake
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dozier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv08657
Plaintiff:
Chris Roberta Dozier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DePalma v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv05048
Plaintiff:
Chris DePalma
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bell v. Astru et al
as 3:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Sharon-Shawn A. Bell
Defendant:
M. Astru, Linda Dorm, Patrick Niggerd and others
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dozier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv03158
Plaintiff:
Chris Roberta Dozier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Henry, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01190
Plaintiff:
Chris M Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Laska v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00936
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Chris Patrick Laska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bancroft v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00397
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Chris Bancroft
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schnabel v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00190
Petitioner:
Chris Schnabel
Respondent:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Critoph v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00504
Plaintiff:
Chris J Critoph
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
