Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Alvarez Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Natalie J. Alvarez Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Laza v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06712
Plaintiff:
Natalie Maiya Laza
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Natalie Katherine Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fletcher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv02873
Plaintiff:
Keisha Natalie Fletcher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Howe v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
Natalie Howe
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Salisbury v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Natalie A. Salisbury
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv01106
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
James v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03072
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Natalie James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv02360
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Natalie Rose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.