Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01791
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01548
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lugene Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv06721
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodgers v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00653
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Rodgers
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Admin and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Rodgers v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv06739
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Rodgers
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv01449
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2015cv04650
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Pickering-George
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Carolyn W. Colvin, Nancy J. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv01194
Plaintiff:
Annie Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
