Cases 131 - 140 of 107,777
Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice
as 24-1299
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Ameriway Corporation v. Chen
as 24-1298
Not Yet Classified:
AMERIWAY CORPORATION and MAY YAN CHEN
Defendant:
ABILITY CUSTOMS INC., EAGLE TRADING USA, LLC, XIYAN ZHANG and others
United States of America v. Fluman
as 24-1300
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRIAN FLUMAN
Sharhan et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01994
Plaintiff:
Fahd Abdulla Sharhan and 149 Willis Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Professional Sport Service FI OY v. Puck Agency, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv02022
Petitioner:
Professional Sport Service FI OY
Respondent:
Puck Agency, LLC and JMG Sports Agency Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 207 Application for order confirming award of arbitrators
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re: Gracell Biotechnologies Inc.
as 1:2024mc00191
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
Singh v. Garland
as 24-1292
Petitioner:
PARAMJIT SINGH, BALVIR KAUR, MANPREET KAUR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
