Cases 151 - 160 of 108,182
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Ryzhakova et al
as 1:2024cv04075
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Yana Ryzhakova, N.P., NYC Family Health NP P.C., Family Health NP P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cardenas v. Shore Funding Solutions Inc.
as 2:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Erica Cardenas
Defendant:
Shore Funding Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mayorga-Salamanca v. Garland
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL MAYORGA-SALAMANCA, CAROL ANDREA SUAREZ-CHAPARRO and SARA SOFIA MAYORGA-SUAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Weir v. Montefiore Medical Center
as 24-1527
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WEIR, -
Defendant:
MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, EVRIPIDIS GAVATHIOTIS and others
Mercantile Global Holdings, Inc. v. Hamilton M&A Fund, SP
as 24-1528
Petitioner:
MERCANTILE GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Respondent:
HAMILTON M&A FUND, SP
United States of America v. Yu (Zhang)
as 24-1532
Defendant:
ZHE ZHANG, QING MING YU, ANTONY ABREU and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Murphy v. County of Chemung
as 24-1534
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. MURPHY, JR., -
Defendant:
WILLIAM WASHBURN, COUNTY OF CHEMUNG, CITY OF ELMIRA and others
United States of America v. Brown (Fremont)
as 24-1536
Defendant:
JEAN FREMONT, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS, OLUWAGBENGA AGORO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Warren
as 24-1538
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAQUAN WARREN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
