Cases 11 - 20 of 1,156
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-717
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Gervat v. Freda et al
as 1:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Fabrizio Freda, Ronald S. Lauder, Leonard A. Lauder and others
Barnes v. Dominic
as 24-521
Plaintiff:
JESSIE J. BARNES
Defendant:
Captain STACY DOMINIC, Upstate Correctional Facility, Lieutenant STEVEN SALLS, JR., Upstate Correctional Facility, Lieutenant JAMES H. ANCTIL, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-317
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-238
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
Shackleford v. Dejoy
as 24-204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVE D. SHACKLEFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Mr., Postmaster General, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, USPS, GARY BARKSDALE, Mr., Inspector General and others
David v. British American Tobacco p.l.c et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Gary David
Defendant:
British American Tobacco p.l.c, Jack Marie Henry David Bowles, Tadeu Marroco and others
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NADIRE ATAS
Marek v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gary Marek
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
United States of America v. Roberts (Barnett)
as 23-8124
Defendant:
ANTONIO HENDRICKSON, JUSTINE ROBERTS, WARNER BOYD and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
BERNARD BARNETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
