Cases 11 - 20 of 22
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff Inves
as 12-410
Appellant:
Central New York Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, Construction Employers Association of CNY, Inc., Roofers' Local 195 Health & Accident Fund and others
Appellee:
Irving H. Picard and Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Claimant:
Margaret H. Brown, Nancy S. DeNero, Sally S. Beaudette and others
Intervenor:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
IN RE MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION
as 1:2007cv09633
Lead Plaintiff:
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Life Enrichment Foundation, Alan Maltzman, Carl Esposito and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael J. Savena, Gary Kosseff, Robert R. Garber and others
Petitioner:
Frankfurt Trust, James Conn, Anna Molin and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Stanley O'Neal, Ahmass L. Fakahany and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Capital Trust I, Merrill Lynch Capital Trust III, Lawrence A. Tosi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc
as 11-1589
Plaintiff:
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Life Enrichment Foundation, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Alan Maltzman and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Miriam Loveman
Defendant:
Peter Stingi, John and Jane Doe 1, John and Jane Does 2 through 10 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Stanley O'Neal, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Ahmass L. Fakahany and others
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC et al v. Shumlin et al
as 1:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Peter Shumlin , William Sorrell , James Volz and others
Amicu:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts , Conservation Law Foundation , Vermont Public Interest Research Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2011
National Labor Relations Board
as 11-247
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
Local Union International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL CIO
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation
Local Union 36 International v. National Labor Relations Board
as 10-3448
Petitioner:
Local Union International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL CIO
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Local No. 38 International Bro v. American Express Company
as 10-3323
Plaintiff:
John Baydale, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Local No. 38 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Pension Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
American Express Company, Kenneth I. Chenault and Daniel T. Henry
Abramsky, et al v. Alstom SA, et al
as 1:2003cv06595
Plaintiff:
Michael Abramsky
Defendant:
Alstom SA , Pierre Bilger , Patrick Kron and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Rosenbaum Partners, L.P. , Claude M. Shelby , Rahmi Soyugenc and others
Movant:
Bruce Morris, The State Universities Retirement System of Illinois, West Virginia Investment Management Board and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Francois Newey , James Milner , William Purves and others
Trustee:
San Diego City Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
-CLP Done et al v. Brooklyn Hospital Center et al
as 1:2003cv01614
Cross Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital Center
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital Center, City of New York, John Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Done, Francisco Felix, Armando Tirado and others
Cross Claimant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Local Union No. 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
I.B.E.W. Local 139 Annuity, Pension, Welfare, and Education Funds et al v. Clark et al
as 6:2009mc06006
Plaintiff:
I.B.E.W. Local 139 Annuity, Pension, Welfare, and Education Funds and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 139
Defendant:
Jason T. Clark and Melissa S. Clark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
