Cases 11 - 20 of 159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Romero v. Garland
as 23-7880
Petitioner:
VERONICA ARACELY ROMERO and ADELIN SOFIA ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Romero v. BronxCare Hospital
as 23-7817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESUS M. ROMERO, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BRONXCARE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, Security Officer PEREZ, MILDRED OLIVERASRIVERA and others
Zelaya-Romero v. Garland
as 23-6993
Petitioner:
ARIXI MARBELY ZELAYA-ROMERO and RUTH IVETH CARRILLO-ZELAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wood v. National Park Service et al
as 2:2023cv06249
Plaintiff:
Samuel Wood
Defendant:
National Park Service, Debra Haaland and Alexcy Romero
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Columna v. Gomez
as 23-6433
Appellant:
DARWIN COLUMNA
Appellee:
GENNER GOMEZ and PEDRO ROMERO
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, JOHN DOE, THE CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Kenmar Securities, LLC v. UFINET Latam, S.L.U. et al
as 1:2023cv03737
Petitioner:
Kenmar Securities, LLC
Respondent:
UFINET Latam, S.L.U., Juan Carlos Menndez Romero, Gastn Menndez Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate
United States of America v. Echevarria (Heyward)
as 23-6255
Defendant:
ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ, MARQUIS WRIGHT and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
COREY HEYWARD
United States of America v. Romero (Santos)
as 22-3213
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rafael Romero and Albert Rodriguez
Defendant / Appellant:
Rafael Santos
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
