Cases 11 - 20 of 146
Boster v. Ricci et al
as 1:2023cv06186
Plaintiff:
Amanda Boster
Defendant:
Jonathan Ricci, Charles L. Jemley, Brian Maxwell and others
Nominal Defendant:
Dutch Bros Inc.
Wakefield v. Ricci et al
as 1:2023cv05653
Plaintiff:
Darren Wakefield
Defendant:
Jonathan Ricci, Charles L. Jemley, Travis Boersma and others
Nominal Defendant:
Dutch Bros Inc.
Hudson v. Ricci et al
as 1:2023cv05010
Plaintiff:
Brennan Hudson
Defendant:
Jonathan Ricci, Charles L. Jemley, Travis Boersma and others
Nominal Defendant:
Dutch Bros Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Amanda Boster and Darren Wakefield
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reed v. Burge
as 23-6448
Appellant:
ROBERT I. REED
Appellee:
JOHN BURGE, JB, TEDFORD, BRUCE YELICH and others
Moore et al v. Standard Chartered PLC et al
as 1:2023cv02834
Plaintiff:
Maribel Moore, Wilfredo Robles, Wilberto Robles-Santa and others
Defendant:
Standard Chartered PLC and Standard Chartered Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
United States of America v. Jackson
as 23-6281
Defendant:
AMAR SCOTT, YULANDER GREEN, JERRICK DENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACKSON, Boosum and Boots
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Felder
as 23-6192
Defendant:
JERMAINE BRANFORD, ENAL C. LAROSE, MIZAIR LICONA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRONE FELDER, Seled Defendant #3 and T-Bone
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Travis v. Guzman
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Svetlana Travis
Defendant:
Isabella Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Reinhardt v. HV Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Charles Reinhardt
Defendant:
HV Bancorp, Inc., Travis J. Thompson, Robert J. Marino and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
