Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Harris v. Burge
as 10-2439
Petitioner:
Frank Harris
Respondent:
John Burge, Superintendent of Aiburn Correctional Facility
Soto v. Keenan, et al
as 6:2003cv06272
Plaintiff:
Efrain Soto
Defendant:
Shawn/Shaun Keenan , Daniel Labuzzetta , Kevin Burg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crisler v. Burge
as 6:2004cv06417
Petitioner:
Frank Crisler
Respondent:
John Burge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Burge
as 1:2003cv00755
Petitioner:
James Lewis
Respondent:
John Burge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Burge
as 1:2003cv00711
Petitioner:
Charlie Watkins
Respondent:
John J. Burge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re Herald, Primeo and Thema Funds Securities Litigation
as 1:2009cv00289
Defendant:
BA Worldwide Fund Management, Ltd., Dr. Hans-Peter Tiefenbacher, Unicredit SPA and others
Plaintiff:
Neville Seymour Davis, Korea Exchange Bank and Dana Trezziova
Petitioner:
Peter Brandhofer, Nurnberger Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft Osterreich and Foxton Group
Lead Plaintiff:
Dr. Schmuel Cabilly, Repex Ventures S.A and Shmuel Cabilly
Not Classified By Court:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. and Bernard L. Madoff.
Interested Party:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as a proposed defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Phillips
as 1:2003cv06073
Respondent:
Richard A. Brown, John W. Burge and Elmira Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
Bruce King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2007mc00272
Plaintiff:
Herman C. McMillian
Defendant:
The State of New York, New York State Department of Corrections, John Burges and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
