Cases 21 - 30 of 1,428
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
570 CONCRETE, LLC v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
570 CONCRETE, LLC
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Compagnie De Saint-Gobain S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
M&D Peterson, LLC v. SIKA AG et al
as 1:2024cv03056
Not Yet Classified:
IN RE CONCRETE & CEMENT ADDITIVES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
M&D Peterson, LLC
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
LAKEWOOD CONCRETE CORP. v. SIKA AG et al
as 1:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
LAKEWOOD CONCRETE CORP.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
KEYSTONE CONCRETE BLOCK & SUPPLY CO. INC. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03033
Plaintiff:
KEYSTONE CONCRETE BLOCK & SUPPLY CO. INC.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Accardi v. County of Suffolk
as 24-903
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. ACCARDI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Lieutenant ANDREW MANFREDONIA and others
Ezekwo v. St. Philip Neri
as 24-892
Plaintiff:
Dr. IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
ST. PHILIP NERI CATHOLIC CHURCH, Bronx, New York, RICHARD COPPOLA, Esq., Rev. Msgr JOSEPH P. LAMORTE and others
Soley v. County of Nassau
as 24-880
Plaintiff:
EAN SOLEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NASSAU, NASSAU COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, P.O. OMAR D. GALAN, Shield 3660 and others
Perlman v. General Electric
as 24-514
Plaintiff:
CAROL PERLMAN
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR. and others
Parker v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, Inc.
as 24-688
Plaintiff:
MARIAN E. PARKER
Defendant:
ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK OF NEW YORK, INC. and JOHN DOE 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
