Cases 21 - 30 of 256
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
Williams v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv09326
Plaintiff:
Shaquala Williams
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1514 A
Lue v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 21-892
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., a Delaware Corporation, Alex Khavin, an individual, Baruch Horowitz, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Candice Lue, an individual
Eastman Kodak Company v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 21-663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Defendant / Appellee:
Pacorini Metals USA, LLC, Henry Bath LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and others
Defendant:
Henry Bath & Son Limited, Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C., Glencore Ltd. and others
Fujifilm Manufacturing U.S.A. v. Goldman Sachs & Co.
as 21-643
Defendant / Appellee:
Pacorini Metals Vlissingen B.V., Pacorini Metals USA, LLC, Henry Bath LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fujifilm Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc., Eastman Kodak Company, Custom Aluminum Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Reynolds Consumer Products LLC, Seating Constructors USA, Inc., Admiral Beverage Corporation and others
Defendant:
London Metal Exchange Limited, Glencore Xstrata Incorporated, Glencore UK Ltd and others
AGFA Corporation v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 21-651
Defendant / Appellee:
Pacorini Metals USA, LLC, Henry Bath LLC, Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AGFA Corporation and AGFA Graphics NV
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., Glencore Xstrata PLC and London Metal Exchange Limited
Mag Instrument, Inc. v. The Goldman Sachs Group Inc
as 21-660
Defendant / Appellee:
Pacorini Metals USA, LLC, Henry Bath LLC, Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., London Metal Exchange Limited, Glencore Xstrata PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mag Instrument Incorporated and Mag Instrument, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
