Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 732
Weiss v. Pioneer Natural Resources Company et al
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff: Steven Weiss
Defendant: Pioneer Natural Resources Company, J. Kenneth Thompson, Richard P. Dealy and others
Saba Capital Master Fund, LTD. v. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
as 24-83
Plaintiff / Appellee: SABA CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD. and SABA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Defendant: MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC., BLACKROCK ESG CAPITAL ALLOCATION TRUST, BLACKROCK INNOVATION AND GROWTH TERM TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellant: ROYCE GLOBAL VALUE TRUST, INC.
Saba Capital Master Fund, LTD. v. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
as 24-80
Defendant / Appellee: SABA CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD. and SABA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Defendant: MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC., BLACKROCK ESG CAPITAL ALLOCATION TRUST, BLACKROCK INNOVATION AND GROWTH TERM TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellant: ADAMS DIVERSIFIED EQUITY FUND, INC. and ADAMS NATURAL RESOURCES FUND
Saba Capital Master Fund, LTD. v. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
as 24-79
Plaintiff / Appellee: SABA CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD. and SABA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Defendant: MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC., BLACKROCK ESG CAPITAL ALLOCATION TRUST, BLACKROCK INNOVATION AND GROWTH TERM TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellant: FS CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES CORP.
Martinaj v. Uhler
as 24-72
Plaintiff / Appellant: BERNARDO MARTINAJ
Plaintiff: JOHN AMANTE, ARISMENDI FABIAN, STEVE ARMENTO and others
Defendant / Appellee: DONALD UHLER, Superintendent; Upstate Correctional Facility, JOSEPH BELLNIER, Deputy Commissioner, Correctional Facilities Operations, DONALD QUINN, First Deputy Superintendent; Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant: STEVEN RACETTE, Superintendent; Clinton Correctional Facility, WIDDUN, CERT Officer, CERT OFFICER NO. 3441 OR 3448 and others
Saba Capital Master Fund, LTD. v. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
as 24-82
Plaintiff / Appellee: SABA CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD. and SABA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Defendant: MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC., BLACKROCK ESG CAPITAL ALLOCATION TRUST, BLACKROCK INNOVATION AND GROWTH TERM TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellant: TORTOISE MIDSTREAM ENERGY FUND, INC., TORTOISE ENERGY INDEPENDENCE FUND, INC., TORTOISE PIPELINE & ENERGY FUND, INC. and others
Knighton v. Hartman
as 24-45
Plaintiff / Appellee: RAY ANTHONY KNIGHTON
Defendant: NIGEL RODNEY, RN, K. PHILLIPS, RN, JANINE BRENNAN and others
Defendant / Appellant: AMY HARTMAN, JOSHUA CLARK and NICHOLAS SULLIVAN
Saba Capital Master Fund, LTD. v. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
as 23-8104
Defendant: FRANK J, FABOZZI, MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC., CLEARBRIDGE ENERGY MIDSTREAM OPPORTUNITY FUND INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SABA CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD. and SABA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Defendant / Appellant: BLACKROCK ESG CAPITAL ALLOCATION TRUST and BLACKROCK INNOVATION AND GROWTH TERM TRUST
Torres v. Adult Probation
as 23-8084
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTHONY TORRES
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICE OF ADULT PROBATION, Court Support Services (CSSD) Connecticut Superior Court, State of Connecticut, NICOLE GRELLA, COURTNEY RING and others
Defendant: JOHN DOES, 1-25 and OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Supreme Court Building, State of Connecticut
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 23-8047
Plaintiff: TAVERAS, Garner CI, CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, ISAIAH BONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY
Defendant / Appellee: CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?