Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. BSZ Chiropractic, P.C. et al
as 1:2012cv05536
Defendant:
ABC Corps, 1-3, BSZ Chiropractic, P.C., Nicholas Fennelli, D.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Mark Soffer, D.C. et al
as 1:2012cv05535
Defendant:
ABC Corps. 1-3, Angela Marie Cancellieri, D.C., John Does 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Company,, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Burshteyn, MD et al
as 1:2011cv05084
Defendant:
A Plus Medical, PC, ABC Corps. 1-6, Arcadia Imaging, PC and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Company,, Geico General Insurance Company,, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
3801 Beach Channel, Inc. et al v. Shvartzman et al
as 11-2777
Plaintiff:
3801 Beach Channel, Inc., All Plaintiffs and Yefim Yezerskiy
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yevgeniy Yezerskiy
Defendant:
Alexander Iorsh, Alexander Herman, John Doe 1-5 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Beach Channel Services, Inc. and Yakov Shvartsman
Stanziale v. Professional Driver Institute, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00021
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Stanziale, Jr.
Defendant:
Professional Driver Institute, Inc. and ABC Corp. (1-20)
In re: Telcar Group, LLC
as 2:2007mc00185
Defendant:
Anthony Levey, Anthony Levey, Anthony Levey and others
Plaintiff:
R. Kenneth Barnard
Debtor:
Telcar Group, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
