Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Amduso v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and THE IRANIAN MINISTRY of INFO. & SECURITY
as 1:2016cv03901
Plaintiff:
Milly Mikali Amduso , Ephantus Njagi Mbogo , Isaac Kariuki Mbogo and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and THE IRANIAN MINISTRY of INFO. & SECURITY, Republic of the Sudan , Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of the Sudan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1610
Beisel v. La Quinta Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03068
Plaintiff:
Paul Beisel
Defendant:
La Quinta Holdings Inc. , Wayne B. Goldberg, Keith A. Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowers v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00306
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bowers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowers v. Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP
as 1:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
Vincent D. Bowers
Defendant:
Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bowers v. Webcollex, LLC d/b/a CKS Financial
as 1:2012cv00698
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bowers
Defendant:
Webcollex, LLC d/b/a CKS Financial
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowers v. EOS CCA
as 1:2012cv00543
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bowers
Defendant:
EOS CCA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowers v. Synergetic Communication, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00535
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bowers
Defendant:
Synergetic Communication, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowers v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau LLC
as 1:2012cv00507
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bowers
Defendant:
Mercantile Adjustment Bureau LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
