Cases 31 - 40 of 304
Moore et al v. Standard Chartered PLC et al
as 1:2023cv02834
Plaintiff:
Maribel Moore, Wilfredo Robles, Wilberto Robles-Santa and others
Defendant:
Standard Chartered PLC and Standard Chartered Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Powell v. Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01526
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Powell
Defendant:
Duck Creek Technologies, Inc., Bill Bloom, Kathy Crusco and others
Fields et al v. Lafarge, S.A.
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tamara Fields, Estate of Lloyd Carl Fields Jr., Heather Gavino and others
Defendant:
Lafarge, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dorrien v. CarLotz, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09463
Plaintiff:
Derek Dorrien
Defendant:
CarLotz, Inc., Linda B. Abraham, Steven G. Carrel and others
Fuentes-Fuentes v. Garland
as 22-6478
Petitioner:
TOMASA FUENTES-FUENTES, KATHERINE ELIZABETH MEJIA-FUENTES and KIMBERLY DANIELA FUENTES-FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wilhelm v. Switch, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05785
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Switch, Inc., Rob Roy, Donald D. Snyder and others
William v. RedBox Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05585
Plaintiff:
Chad William
Defendant:
RedBox Entertainment, Inc., Galen C. Smith, Gregory W. Frenzel and others
Whitfield v. Redbox Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05613
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Redbox Entertainment, Inc., Galen C. Smith, Gregory W. Frenzel and others
United States of America v. Graham (Degree)
as 22-1397
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lairon Graham, AKA Shah, Kimberly Udrea, Joseph Ward and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas Degree, AKA Tommy
Waterman v. Switch, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05523
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Rob Roy, Angela Archon, Jason Genrich and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
