Cases 31 - 40 of 862
IN RE SHANDA GAMES LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 22-3076
Plaintiff:
Astor BK Realty Trust, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Monk
Defendant / Appellee:
Shanda Games Limited, Yingfeng Zhang, Li Yao and others
United States of America v. Chung
as 22-2869
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chen I. Chung, Siu Man Wong, Brian Chan and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tung Tran
Bushansky v. Antokol et al
as 1:2022cv06758
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Robert Antokol, Marc Beilinson, Tian Lin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lin v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09002
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lin
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
Lin v. Garland
as 22-6476
Petitioner:
GUANG LIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lin v. Cioppa et al
as 1:2022cv05517
Plaintiff:
Meiying Lin
Defendant:
District Director Thomas Cioppa, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou and Alejandro N. Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 22-1996
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Howard Redmond, NYPD Inspector, sued in individual and official capacities, Ralph Nieves, former NYPD Lieutenant, sued in individual and official capacities and others
Lin v. Garland
as 22-6419
Petitioner:
YANMING LIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Gu
as 22-1877
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Matthew Abel
Defendant / Appellant:
Alison Gu, AKA Alison Ling, AKA Ally Koo, AKA Ai J. Chen, AKA Jing Shao, AKA Yijing Gu, AKA Yijing Lin, AKA Alison Yi Gu, AKA Ai Jen Chen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
