Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 891
Tripathy v. Schneider
as 24-560
Plaintiff: SANJAY TRIPATHY
Defendant: ANDREA N. SCHNEIDER, Acting Superintendent Gowanda CF, D. LOCKWOOD, Acting Deputy Superintendent of Security, Gowanda CF, M.D. JOHN MORLEY, Deputy Commissioner & Chief Medical Officer, DOCCS, Albany, NY and others
Keating v. Miller
as 24-542
Petitioner: MICHAEL KEATING
Respondent: MARK MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT
Sloley v. NYS DOCCS
as 24-662
Plaintiff: MAXMILLIAN SLOLEY and BX
Defendant: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Correction Officer JOYCE, P.A. MILOV and others
James v. State of New York
as 24-624
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Defendant: STATE OF NEW YORK and DONITA E. MCINTOSH, FORMER CLINTON DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF PROGRAM
Scharkey v. Bennett
as 24-600
Petitioner: JAMES SCHARKEY
Respondent: S. BENNETT, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Hall v. Annucci
as 24-565
Plaintiff: RALPH HALL
Defendant: ANTHONY ANNUCCI, DOCCS Commissioner, in his official and personal capacity, PATRICK GRIFFIN, SUPERINTENDENT, GHCF Superintendent, in his official and personal capacity, DR. BENTIVENGA, GHCF Medical Supervisor, in his official and personal capacity and others
Pendell v. Shanley
as 24-526
Petitioner: PERRY PENDELL
Respondent: RAYMOND SHANLEY, Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional facility
Kelsey v. Lewin
as 24-483
Petitioner: MICHAEL N. KELSEY
Respondent: DONNA LEWIN, Hudson Correctional Facility Superintendent
James v. D'Amore
as 24-474
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Respondent: MICHAEL D'AMORE, Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
Bradshaw v. Uhler
as 24-446
Plaintiff: JAY BRADSHAW
Defendant: Corrections Officer WALRATH, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as John Does 4 and 6, Sergeant FLETCHER, Upstate Correctional Facility, TROMBLY, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as Trombley and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?