Cases 31 - 40 of 48
In Re Herald, Primeo and Thema
as 12-184
Defendant / Appellee:
Alberto LaRocca, Pioneer Alternative Investment Management Limited, Herald (LUX) and others
Defendant:
William A. Jones, Richard Goddard, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Schmuel Cabilly, Neville Seymour Davis, Dana Trezziova and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shmuel Cabilly and Korea Exchange Bank
In Re Herald, Primeo and Thema
as 12-162
Plaintiff:
Repex Ventures S.A, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Shmuel Cabilly, Schmuel Cabilly and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neville Seymour Davis and Dana Trezziova
Defendant:
Bernard L. Madoff, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, Bank Medici S.A. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sonja Kohn, Primeo Executive Fund, Primeo Select Fund and others
In Re Herald, Primeo and Thema
as 12-156
Plaintiff:
Repex Ventures S.A, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Shmuel Cabilly, Schmuel Cabilly and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dana Trezziova
Defendant:
Bernard L. Madoff, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, Bank Medici S.A. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sonja Kohn, Primeo Select Fund, Primeo Executive Fund and others
In Re: Herald, Primeo and Them
as 12-156
Defendant / Appellee:
Alberto LaRocca, Pioneer Alternative Investment Management Limited, Herald USA Fund and others
Defendant:
William A. Jones, Richard Goddard, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Schmuel Cabilly and Repex Ventures S.A, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neville Seymour Davis, Shmuel Cabilly, Korea Exchange Bank and others
In Re Herald, Primeo and Thema
as 12-162
Defendant / Appellee:
Alberto LaRocca, Pioneer Alternative Investment Management Limited, Herald (LUX) and others
Defendant:
William A. Jones, Richard Goddard, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Schmuel Cabilly, Shmuel Cabilly, Repex Ventures S.A, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neville Seymour Davis and Dana Trezziova
Securities and Exchange Commis v. McGinn, Smith & Company, Incor
as 11-4238
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
McGinn, Smith & Company, Incorporated, McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC, McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Geoffrey R. Smith, Trustee of the David L. and Lynn A. Smith Irrevocable Trust U/A 8/04/04 and Lauren T. Smith
Securities and Exchange Commis v. McGinn, Smith & Company, Incor
as 11-3848
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
McGinn, Smith & Company, Incorporated, McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC, McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
David M. Wojeski, Trustee of the David L. and Lynn A. Smith Irrevocable Trust U/A 8/04/04
Securities and Exchange Commis v. McGinn, Smith & Company, Incor
as 11-3851
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Appellant:
Jill A. Dunn and Jill A. Dunn
Defendant:
McGinn, Smith & Company, Incorporated, McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC, McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corporation and others
Securities and Exchange Commis v. McGinn, Smith & Company, Incor
as 11-3843
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Appellant:
Jill A. Dunn
Defendant:
McGinn, Smith & Company, Incorporated, McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC, McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Lynn A. Smith, Lauren T. Smith, David M. Wojeski, Trustee of the David L. and Lynn A. Smith Irrevocable Trust U/A 8/04/04 and others
Securities and Exchange Commis v. McGinn, Smith & Company, Incor
as 11-3845
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
McGinn, Smith & Company, Incorporated, McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC, McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Geoffrey R. Smith and Lauren T. Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
