Other Statutes Cases filed in New York
Cases 41 - 50 of 661
LAT Long Infrastructure, LLC et al v. Gold Crest Capital, LLC (aka Goldcrest, aka Goldcrest Capital, LLC) et al
as 1:2023cv00955
Plaintiff: LAT Long Infrastructure, LLC and Daniel Robert Urban
Defendant: Gold Crest Capital, LLC (aka Goldcrest, aka Goldcrest Capital, LLC), Hybrid Advance, LLC, Shia Dembitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Schottenstein et al v. Capla et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10883
Plaintiff: MD DOUGLAS SCHOTTENSTEIN, Schottenstein Pain and Neuro, PLLC d/b/a NY Spine Medicine, Douglas Schottenstein and others
Defendant: Orthogen, FDA Food and Drug Administration, MD Robert M. Califf and others
Nominal Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration and M.D. Robert M. Califf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lateral Recovery LLC et al v. HFH Capital LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10414
Plaintiff: Lateral Recovery LLC, Benchmark Builders, Inc., FTE Networks, Inc. and others
Defendant: HFH Capital LLC d/b/a HFH CAP, HFH Capital Funding LLC d/b/a HFH CAP, Israel Wasserman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lateral Recovery LLC et al v. Preferred Capital LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10447
Plaintiff: Lateral Recovery LLC, Benchmark Builders, Inc., FTE Networks, Inc and others
Defendant: Preferred Capital LLC, YISROEL WEINSTEIN and John and Jane Doe Investors
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lateral Recovery LLC et al v. Trenen Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10429
Plaintiff: Lateral Recovery LLC, Benchmark Builders, Inc., FTE Networks, Inc. and others
Defendant: Trenen Capital, Inc., Eliyahu Sanderson a/k/a Eli Sanderson a/k/a Elliot Sanderson, John and Jane Doe Investors and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10098
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lateral Recovery LLC et al v. Second Chance Funding LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10032
Plaintiff: Lateral Recovery LLC, Benchmark Builders, Inc., FTE Networks, Inc. and others
Defendant: Second Chance Funding LLC, Yosef Brezel and John and Jane Doe Investors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10019
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase & Co.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Not Classified By Court: Jordana H. Feldman, Epstein Victims Compensation Program and Bradley J. Edwards
3Rd Party Defendant: James Edward Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe 1 v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10018
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1
Defendant: Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Consolidated Plaintiff: Government of the United States Virgin Islands
Consolidated Defendant: JP Morgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Not Classified By Court: Epstein Victims Compensation Program and Jordana H. Feldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lateral Recovery LLC et al v. Unique Funding Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2022cv09876
Plaintiff: Lateral Recovery LLC, Benchmark Builders, Inc., FTE Networks, Inc. and others
Defendant: Unique Funding Solutions LLC, Yaakov Winograd a/k/a Jake Winograd, John and Jane Doe Investors and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?