Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Valls v. The Republic of Argentina
as 14-2107
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ruben Chorny, Hickory Securities Ltd., Elizabeth Andrea Azza and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Republic of Argentina
Puricelli v. Republic of Argentina
as 14-2104
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Hickory Securities Ltd., Anibal Campo, Claudia Florencia Valls and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Republic of Argentina
United States of America v. Joseph Del Valle
as 14-1685
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Joseph Del Valle
Valls v. Republic of Argentina
as 14-1542
Respondent:
Claudia Florencia Valls, Hickory Securities Ltd. and Elizabeth Andrea Azza
Petitioner:
Republic of Argentina
Valls v. Republic of Argentina
as 14-1542
Petitioner:
The Republic of Argentina
Respondent:
Elizabeth Andrea Azza, Claudia Florencia Valls and Hickory Securities, Ltd.
United States of America v. Camacho (Valle)
as 14-835
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alex Cespedes, Gary Sanchez, Manuel Pimenteo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jancey Valle, AKA Chauncey
United States of America v. Camacho
as 14-797
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jancey Valle, AKA Chauncey, Alex Cespedes, Gary Sanchez and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Julio Camacho, AKA King Honesty
United States of America v. Camacho
as 14-677
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alex Cespedes, Gary Sanchez, Manuel Pimenteo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Javion Camacho, AKA King Kong, AKA Jay, Julio Camacho, AKA King Honesty and Jancey Valle, AKA Chauncey
Valle v. United States of America
as 14-273
Petitioner:
Israel Valle
Respondent:
United States of America and United States Department of Justice, its U.S. government agencies, officers or employees of the United States (28 U.S.C 1391(e) (1992 &supp. 1992) of [federal defendant superior] United State of America of said state, city, and county
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
