Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 342
Bak v. Government Legal Department
as 1:2022cv05446
Plaintiff: Er Bak and Eric Tymell Miles-Baker
Defendant: Government Legal Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miles-Baker v. U.S. Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agriculture Service
as 1:2022cv05077
Plaintiff: Eric Tymell Miles-Baker
Defendant: U.S. Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agriculture Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miles-Baker v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
as 1:2022cv04684
Plaintiff: Eric T. Miles-Baker
Defendant: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07219
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06599
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nathan v. ServiceSource International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05734
Plaintiff: Miriam Nathan
Defendant: ServiceSource International, Inc., Gary B. Moore, Richard Walker and others
Baker v. Bloomberg L.P.
as 1:2022cv04988
Plaintiff: Tyler Baker
Defendant: Bloomberg L.P.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 271
Miles-Baker v. The United State of America
as 1:2022cv03710
Plaintiff: Eric T. Miles-Baker
Defendant: The United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Baker (Charles)
as 22-1672
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Danielle Baker, Clarence Brooks, Jorcetta King, AKA Joey and others
Defendant / Appellant: Kyle Charles, AKA Forty
Rheaume v. Baker
as 22-6205
Petitioner: ALLEN RHEAUME
Respondent: JAMES BAKER, COMMISSIONER OF THE VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?