Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Owens v. National Principal Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00784
Plaintiff:
Christine Owens
Defendant:
National Principal Group, LLC and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Welch v. PDL Recovery Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Garfield Welch
Defendant:
PDL Recovery Group, LLC and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
New York State Catholic Health Plan, Inc. v. Academy O & P Associates et al
as 1:2015cv03298
Defendant:
Academy O & P Associates, Academy Orthotic and Prosthetic Associates IPA, Inc., John Callaghan and others
Identities Not Presently Known But Intended To Be Owners And/or Principals Of Either Academy O&P A:
John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
New York State Catholic Health Plan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Quoi v. ARM WNY, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00475
Plaintiff:
Phuong Quoi
Defendant:
ARM WNY, LLC, Adam March, Anthony Coppola and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Flores v. Cred X Debt Recovery, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jorge Flores
Defendant:
Cred X Debt Recovery, LLC and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Owens v. Arm Wyn, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Christine Owens
Defendant:
Arm Wyn, LLC, Adam March, Anthony Coppola and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Hatfield Portfolio Group LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01060
Plaintiff:
Deborah Anne Miller
Defendant:
Hatfield Portfolio Group LLC, Harbinger Processing Group, LLC, Ashley Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
