Cases 41 - 50 of 894
Kelsey v. Lewin
as 24-483
Petitioner:
MICHAEL N. KELSEY
Respondent:
DONNA LEWIN, Hudson Correctional Facility Superintendent
James v. D'Amore
as 24-474
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Respondent:
MICHAEL D'AMORE, Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
Bradshaw v. Uhler
as 24-446
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Defendant:
Corrections Officer WALRATH, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as John Does 4 and 6, Sergeant FLETCHER, Upstate Correctional Facility, TROMBLY, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as Trombley and others
Fagan v. Superintendent
as 24-432
Petitioner:
KEITH FAGAN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, Eastern NY Correctional Facility
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-416
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. BARBOSA, CHO, Mid-State Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Davila v. New York City Department of Education
as 24-415
Plaintiff:
OLGA DAVILA
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MEISHA PORTER, School Chancellor, CHARLES PEEPLES, HR Director and others
Booker v. Noeth
as 24-407
Petitioner:
AMIN BOOKER
Respondent:
JOSEPH H. NOETH, Superintendent of Attica Facility
White-Span v. Corey
as 24-350
Plaintiff:
JOVELL WHITE-SPAN
Respondent:
JOSEPH E. COREY, SUPERINTENDENT
United States of America v. Rudaj
as 24-321
Defendant:
NARDINO COLOTTI, NIKOLA DEDAJ, PRENKA IVEZAJ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX RUDAJ, Sandro Rudovic, Uncle and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Inoa v. Dziduch
as 24-269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE INOA
Defendant / Appellee:
L.T. DZIDUCH, L.T. ENSER, L.T. DELANEY and others
Defendant:
ATTICA C.F., Medical Personel John Doe(s); Jane Doe(s) and ATTICA C.F., Office of Mental Health, John Doe(s); Jane Doe(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
