Cases 41 - 45 of 45
United States of America v. Montanez (Stith)
as 11-4935
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edwin Montanez, AKA Sha, AKA Sha Dic, AKA Shadigga, AKA Shy, Ken Kinsey, Jr., AKA Benji, AKA Jade, Karriem Williams, AKA Calo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Clifton Stith, AKA Tony, AKA Yayo
United States of America v. Montanez (Brantley)
as 11-4933
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edwin Montanez, AKA Sha, AKA Sha Dic, AKA Shadigga, AKA Shy, Ken Kinsey, Jr., AKA Benji, AKA Jade, Karriem Williams, AKA Calo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Adib Brantley, AKA Sha Blood and Clifton Stith, AKA Tony, AKA Yayo
United States of America v. Applins (Thomas)
as 11-3761
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy J. Applins, AKA Gee, AKA Billy Pringle, James Kelly, AKA Boom, Nathan Speights, The Mole and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gregory Thomas, AKA Little Earl, E-Z
Precision Associates, Inc et al v. Panalpina World Transport (Holding) LTD. et al
as 1:2008cv00042
Defendant:
Spedlogswiss, Morrison Express Corporation (USA), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Frances Wright, Gabby Gottlieb doing business as Ego Communications/Cantrade, Dan Weatherly doing business as Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sunward International Inc., David Howell Product Design Inc., d/b/a David Howell & Company, Mary Elle Fashions, d/b/a Meridian Electric and others
Intervenor:
Sony Electronics, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Dell, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Garden City Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
National Labor Relations Board v. Carnival Carting, Inc.
as 1:2007mc00119
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Carnival Carting, Inc.
Garnishee:
Prince Custom Tailor, John Bardsley, Inc., Canes Style, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
