Cases 41 - 50 of 427
United States of America v. Baker (Charles)
as 22-1672
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danielle Baker, Clarence Brooks, Jorcetta King, AKA Joey and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Kyle Charles, AKA Forty
Johnson v. Rodeway Inn Syracuse
as 22-1489
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Rodeway Inn Syracuse, Pro Se Corporation, Choice Hotels International Inc., Pro Se Corporation, Commissioner Teresa Gaffney, Pro Se Govt. Employee and others
United States of America v. Marrero (Slater)
as 22-1462
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nelson Marrero, Andrew Alston, AKA Drew High, Sammie Artis, AKA Poppy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Nathaniel Slater
United States of America v. Graham (Degree)
as 22-1397
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lairon Graham, AKA Shah, Kimberly Udrea, Joseph Ward and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas Degree, AKA Tommy
Xu v. Direxion Shares ETF Trust et al
as 1:2022cv05090
Plaintiff:
Lee Xu, Stephen M Szymanski, ROBERT K. WOLVINGTON and others
Defendant:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust, Rafferty Asset Management, LLC, Direxion Family of Investment Companies and others
Wolfe v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04895
Plaintiff:
Jack Wolfe
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., Julie A. Schertell, William M. Cook and others
Justice, II v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., William C. Cook, Donna M. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02987
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., William C. Cook, Donna M. Costello and others
Stein v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03800
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., William M. Cook, Donna M. Costello and others
Bell v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
Richard Bell
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Bob Calderoni, Arlen Shenkman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
