Cases 61 - 70 of 732
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 22-2025
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Nicola Aaronson, Kayla Arslanian and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Women of Color For Equal Justice v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
as 22-1832
Petitioner:
Women of Color For Equal Justice, R. Tousaint, E. Pallas and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Jones v. ManTech International Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06905
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
ManTech International Corporation, Kevin M. Phillips, Richard L. Armitage and others
Lawrence v. ManTech International Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06873
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
ManTech International Corporation, Kevin M. Phillips, Richard L. Armitage and others
Stein v. ManTech International Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06501
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
ManTech International Corporation, Kevin M. Phillips, Richard L. Armitage and others
Coffman v. Vectrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03098
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Vectrus, Inc., Charles Prow, Louis J. Giuliano and others
Baker v. Columbia Care Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Defendant:
Columbia Care Inc., Michael Abbott, Nicholas Vita and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Chehebar v. Oscar Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04103
Plaintiff:
Alfred Chehebar
Defendant:
Oscar Health, Inc., Mario Schlosser, Siddhartha Sankaran and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Durand v. Columbia Care Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02917
Plaintiff:
Claude Durand
Defendant:
Columbia Care Inc., Michael Abbott, Nicholas Vita and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
