Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 94
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. VIP Pharmacy Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01341
Defendant: DNA Pharmacy Inc., John Does "1" through "5", VIP Pharmacy Corp. and others
Plaintiff: GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gibson v. Ingraham
as 19-477
Defendant: John Does 1-3, 5-6, Correctional Officers, Adirondack Correctional Facility, Maher, Correctional Officer,Adirondack Correctional Facility, Harris, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee: Ingraham, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Young, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant: Bennie Gibson
LLM Bar Exam, LLC v. Barbri, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3463
Plaintiff - Appellant: LLM Bar Exam, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: Barbri, Inc., Columbia Law School, New York University School of Law and others
Defendant: John Does 1 through 5 and The Regents of the University of California
LLM Bar Exam, LLC v. Barbri, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03770
Plaintiff: LLM Bar Exam, LLC
Defendant: Barbri, Inc., Columbia Law School, New York University School of Law and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Mittal, M.D. et al
as 1:2014cv02624
Plaintiff: American Insurance Company, LM Insurance Corporation, LM Property and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant: City Care Acupuncture, P.C., Mary Jean Endozo, PT, Billy Geris, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Environmental Services, Inc. v. Recycle Green Services, Inc.
as 14-1197
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: Environmental Services, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Recycle Green Services, Inc., Pristine Properties, LLC, Caesar Figueroa and others
Defendant: Unity Fuels, LLC and John Does 1 through 5
Defendant - Appellant: Grease Lightning and Unity Fuels, LLC
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Kogan et al
as 1:2014cv02060
Plaintiff: GEICO Indemnity Company, Geico Casualty Company,, Geico General Insurance Company, and others
Defendant: Robera Glaz, Harmonious Acupuncture, P.C, John Does 1 through 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kule-Rubin v. Bahari Group Limited
as 13-129
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: Farrah Kule-Rubin, Lana Rybak, Sheila Yen-Pfister and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant: Bahari Group Limited, Reza Bahari, individually, and in his official capacities and Fattaneh Bahari, individually, and in her official capacities
Defendant: John Does 1 through 5, Individually, whose names are not currently known, in their official capacities.
Goidel et al v. 122 East 42nd Street, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv05606
Plaintiff: Jonathan Goidel, Andrew Siegel and Goidel & Siegel, LLP
Defendant: 122 East 42nd Street, LLC , Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carrol & Bertilotti, LLP and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRIL
as 1:2012mc00229
Plaintiff: Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees
Defendant: MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., MONIQUE JEFFERSON, MARK BANCROFT, MARCI CARRETO, and John Does 1 through 5 Who are as yet Unidentified Employees of Said Entiti
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?