Cases 1 - 10 of 286
Lawson v. Rubin
as 24-2018
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, DOE COMPANY, YIFAT SCHNUR and others
:
HOWARD RUBIN
Plaintiff:
NATASHA TAGAI, AMY MOORE, BRITTANY HASSEN and others
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Roberts
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, Chief Justice, BRETT KAVANAUGH, Justice, SAMUEL ALITO, Justice and others
Joseph v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv03081
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Ubhi v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv02995
Plaintiff:
Maghar Ubhi
Defendant:
Jaime Leverton, Shenif Visram, Bill Tai and others
La Rosa v. Abbott Laboratories
as 24-1575
Plaintiff:
NATALIA LA ROSA, KEYA JOHNIGAN, PHOEBA CANEDA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, PROCTER & GAMBLE CO, SPD SWISS PRECISION DIAGNOSTICS GMBH and others
Thompson v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv02542
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thompson
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Amigo Shuttle Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
as 24-1087
Plaintiff:
AMIGO SHUTTLE INC. and MICHAEL H. CONNERY, JR.
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, KEW T FLYER INC., CHRISTINA CONTUMELIO and others
Mirinaviciene v. Keuka College
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
STACEY MIRINAVICIENE
Defendant:
KEUKA COLLEGE, AMY STOREY, BRADLEY FUSTER and others
Burrell v. Mason
as 24-737
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BRYAN D. MASON, Sergeant; Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. GORDON, Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. DEYO, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Razzoli v. Richmond University Medical Center
as 24-544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RAZZOLI
Defendant:
RICHMOND UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Dr. DOUGLAS COHEN, Dr. AMI RAVAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
