Cases 1 - 10 of 2,359
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
Flynn v. Verizon Wireless
as 24-1562
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. FLYNN, XIII, JOHN DOES, 1, PHIL MARIE and others
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS, Ct Corporation System, BOB DUFF, THEMIS KLARIDES and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Stratfs, LLC (f/k/a Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC)
as 24-1541
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, STRATEGIC CLIENT SUPPORT, LLC, THE BLUST FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST THROUGH DONALD J. HOLMGREN, TRUSTEE, Relief Defendant and others
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel, Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General and others
Intervenor:
CIBC BANK USA and VALLEY NATIONAL BANK
Receiver:
THOMAS W. MCNAMARA
Wang v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04198
Plaintiff:
Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and North Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hudson v. Warden, Suffolk County Jail
as 24-1321
Petitioner:
MICHEAL HUDSON
Respondent:
WARDEN, Suffolk County Jail, Suffolk County Supreme Court Judge T. MAZZEI and Suffolk County District Attorney RAY TIERNEY
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Amigo Shuttle Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
as 24-1087
Plaintiff:
AMIGO SHUTTLE INC. and MICHAEL H. CONNERY, JR.
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, KEW T FLYER INC., CHRISTINA CONTUMELIO and others
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
United States of America v. Orena
as 24-835
Defendant:
VICTOR J. ORENA, JOSEPH RUSSO, ANTHONY RUSSO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
