Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Merchan-Berrezueta v. Garland
as 24-1452
Petitioner:
FABIAN PATRICIO MERCHAN-BERREZUETA, JHENNY NATALI ALVAREZ-ALVAREZ, MICKEL JOEL MERCHAN-ALVAREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Banoka S.a.r.l. v. Alvarez & Marsal, Inc.
as 24-1352
Petitioner:
BANOKA S.A.R.L., ATYS S.A., RENATO PICCIOTTO and others
Respondent:
ALVAREZ & MARSAL, INC., ALVAREZ & MARSAL TRANSACTION ADVISORY GROUP, LLC, ALVAREZ & MARSAL HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Martinez-Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-1235
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ANTONIO MARTINEZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castillo-Pizarro v. Garland
as 24-933
Petitioner:
BLANCA REBECA CASTILLO-PIZARRO, ALISON DANIELA ALVAREZ-CASTILLO and EVELYN JAZMIN ALVAREZ-CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Alvarez-Ortiz v. Garland
as 24-733
Petitioner:
SINDY FABIOLA ALVAREZ-ORTIZ and MERCY FABIOLA ROMERO-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zhiguisaca-Guaman v. Garland
as 24-631
Petitioner:
LUIS HUMBERTO ZHIGUISACA-GUAMAN, MARIA ALVAREZ-GUAMAN, DIANA ELIZABETH ZHIGUISACA-ALVAREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pauta-Morocho v. Garland
as 23-7891
Petitioner:
ADRIAN ABELARDO PAUTA-MOROCHO, DANIELA FERNANDA ALVAREZ-NIEVES and LIAM ALEXANDER PAUTA-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia Alvarez v. Garland
as 23-7892
Petitioner:
JULIO ALBERTO GARCIA ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
