Cases 1 - 10 of 1,206
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Roberts
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, Chief Justice, BRETT KAVANAUGH, Justice, SAMUEL ALITO, Justice and others
In re Eyewear Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2024cv04826
Plaintiff:
Michelle Morgan, Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and others
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica SA, Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. Feliz (Mungin)
as 24-1620
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUNGIN, JOSE ERBO, JOSE CORTINA PEREZO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
United States of America v. Brown (Fremont)
as 24-1536
Defendant:
JEAN FREMONT, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS, OLUWAGBENGA AGORO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
adidas America, Inc. v. Thome Brown, Inc.
as 24-1510
Plaintiff:
ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., an Oregon corporation
Not Yet Classified:
ADIDAS AG, a foreign entity and THOME BROWN, INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Brown
as 24-1482
Defendant:
DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS, OLUWAGBENGA AGORO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wang v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 1:2024cv02371
Plaintiff:
Dr Hao Zhe Wang and Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, The Real Estate Board of New York, Inc., HOMESERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
