Cases 1 - 10 of 195
Castillo-Pizarro v. Garland
as 24-933
Petitioner:
BLANCA REBECA CASTILLO-PIZARRO, ALISON DANIELA ALVAREZ-CASTILLO and EVELYN JAZMIN ALVAREZ-CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Castillo
as 24-687
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CANDIDO CASTILLO
Castillo v. Kijakazi
as 24-41
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELAINE CASTILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Administration
United States of America v. Martinez Castillo
as 23-8123
Defendant / Appellant:
DARWIN ALEXANDER MARTINEZ CASTILLO and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Castillo et al v. Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC et al
as 1:2023cv10544
Plaintiff:
Robert Castillo, Ancil brown, Bashir Majid and others
Defendant:
Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC, Derek T. Smith, alexander cabeceoras and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Sierra (Cruz)
as 23-7642
Defendant:
LEONIDES SIERRA, RICHARD GONZALEZ, CARLOS URENA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE CRUZ, Sealed Defendant 3, Prostituto and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alonso-Castillo v. Garland
as 23-7288
Petitioner:
EDWARD ALONSO-CASTILLO and Tony Alonso
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chico-Castillo v. Garland
as 23-7289
Petitioner:
OSCAR CHICO-CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Sierra (Geraldo)
as 23-6332
Defendant:
LEONIDES SIERRA, RICHARD GONZALEZ, CARLOS URENA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE CRUZ, MANUEL GERALDO, Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Castillo v. Garland
as 23-6251
Petitioner:
ELMER BALMORE CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
