Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ojo v. Barr
as 20-1437
Petitioner:
Olukayode David Ojo, AKA David Olukayode Ojo, AKA Olukayode Ojo
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Ojo v. United States of America
as 20-1135
Respondent / Appellee:
Eric Abdellah, Lieutenant Frank Maldonado, MDC, John Does, 1-4, (said name(s) being fictitious, the intent of the Plaintiff being to designate male correctional officer(s) involved or present at the scene of the incident, and "Other Correctional Officers Unknown") and others
Respondent:
John Doe, 1-8, (said name(s) being fictitious, the intent of Plaintiff being to designate male correctional officer (s) involved or present at the scene of the incident and other Correctional Officers Unknown)
Petitioner / Appellant:
Olukayode David Ojo
In re: New York City Board of
as 20-661
Plaintiff:
Mayling Ralph, Elsa Gulino, Peter Wilds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Charles Ojo
Ojo v. Barr
as 19-3237
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Olukayode David Ojo, AKA David Olukayodc Ojo, AKA Olukayode Oja
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Solo Para Tus Ojos Pub Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03713
Defendant:
Jimmy Aplicano Castejon, Alicia Chamba and Solo Para Tus Ojos Pub Inc.
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
United States of America v. Ojo
as 14-635
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
David Olukayode Ojo
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. El Ojo Agua Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv06173
Defendant:
Leonides Ayala and El Ojo Agua Corp.
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
