Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Troell et al v. Binance Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2024cv07136
Plaintiff:
A.W., L.S.C., L.M.C. and others
Defendant:
Binance Holdings Limited doing business as Binance doing business as Binance.com and Changpeng Zhao
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Crispin v. Sussel
as 24-2094
Defendant:
BIGA, Counselor, JOHN DOE, #1, PEIREAULT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSSEAN CRISPIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Strong v. Municipal City of Lockport
as 24-1966
Defendant:
SUSAN BJORNHOLM, Assistant District Attorney, Municipal COUNTY OF NIAGARA, BRIAN D. SEAMAN, Niagara County District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
ZHANE Y. STRONG
Doe v. A360 Media, LLC
as 24-1845
Defendant:
A360 MEDIA, LLC and Police Officer JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
AMANDA BLOOM
Li v. Peck
as 24-1659
Plaintiff:
DONGMEI LI
Defendant:
RICHARD PECK, AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE INC, MACKENZIE D'LORIO and others
Doe et al v. Daedone et al
as 1:2024cv04434
Defendant:
OneTaste Inc., Amanda Dunham, Rachel Cherwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Michal Doe, Jane Doe, Kara Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Zioness Movement, Inc. v. The Lawfare Project, Inc.
as 24-974
Not Yet Classified:
ZIONESS MOVEMENT, INC. and THE LAWFARE PROJECT, INC.
Defendant:
AMANDA BERMAN
Weiss v. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., Peter Cannito, Sean Battle and others
Buczek v. Keybank, N.A.
as 23-7591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK
Defendant / Appellee:
KEYBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, (Key Bank), CHRISTOPHER M. GORMAN, An Officer of Keybank, N.A. and an Individual, DAVID P. CASE, Esq., Fein, Such & Crane, LLP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
