Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Shelton v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 2:2024cv02581
Plaintiff:
James E. Shelton
Defendant:
Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baughman v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 2:2023cv05483
Plaintiff:
Zachary Baughman
Defendant:
Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baughman v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 1:2023cv05483
Plaintiff:
Zachary Baughman
Defendant:
Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Romero v. Select Interior Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05539
Plaintiff:
Viviana Romero
Defendant:
Select Interior Concepts, Inc., Donald McAleenan, Robert Scott Vansant and others
Jones v. Select Interior Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08138
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
Select Interior Concepts, Inc., L.W. Varner, Jr., S. Tracy Coster and others
Harding v. Select Interior Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08119
Plaintiff:
Virgil Harding
Defendant:
Select Interior Concepts, Inc., Donald McAleenan, Robert Scott Vansant and others
3F Partners Limited Partnership et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04803
Petitioner:
3F Partners Limited Partnership , 3F Partners Limited Partnership II , Cardiac Concepts, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Medtronic, Inc. , Medtronic ATS Medical, Inc. and 3F Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aqua Massage International, Inc. v. Licht et al
as 3:2013mc00007
Plaintiff:
Aqua Massage International, Inc.
Defendant:
Ella Frenkel Licht, Alan Licht and Simulated Environment Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
