Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 746
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Williams (Davis)
as 24-1425
Defendant: RONALD GLEN DAVIS, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, ALAN ANDERSON and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant: WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roundtree v. Lamont
as 24-1319
Plaintiff: Queen Princess ANJAKNIE ROUNDTREE, -Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglass, ELIZABETH QUEEN, ANDREW, King and others
Defendant: NED LAMONT, State of Connecticut's Governor, JEN ZAROZI, State Capitol Police, DEVIN, Officer and others
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant: WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Goodman (Evans)
as 24-1258
Defendant: WILLIE EVANS, JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Krystal Fruits & Vegetables, Inc. v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv03466
Plaintiff: Krystal Fruits & Vegetables, Inc.
Defendant: Davis A. Rodriguez, Sr., World Depot Distributor Corp., High End Food Service Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff: Keith Dial
Defendant: Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
United States of America v. Davis
as 24-989
Defendant: DERRILYN NEEDHAM, RONALD KNIBBS, RODERICK GUNN and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Royce
as 24-863
Petitioner: LASHAWAN DAVIS
Defendant: MARK ROYCE, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctinoal Facility

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?