Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Donnelly v. Controlled Application Review
as 20-4243
Respondent / Appellee:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting United States Attorney General, L. Francis Cissna, Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mr. Patrick J. Donnelly
Azatullah v. Wolf et al.
as 1:2020cv01069
Defendant:
Lee F Bowes, Acting Director of the New York District of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad W Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II, Acting Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Seir Azatullah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
M. v. Barr
as 19-3426
Respondent / Appellee:
William P. Barr, in his official capacity as the United States Attorney General, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary for the United States Department of Homeland Security and Kenneth Cuccinelli, in his capacity as Purported Acting Director for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joshua M.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LoVerde v. District Director United States Citizenship and Immigration Services New York , New York
as 1:2007cv01516
Plaintiff:
Silvestro LoVerde
Defendant:
District Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
LoVerde v. District Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services New York, New York
as 1:2007cv02040
Plaintiff:
Silvestro LoVerde
Defendant:
District Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
